GLOBE TEAM: Planetary-Focused steamHouse Practice
Framework Guide
Version 1.0 | December 2025 Status: Framework-level draft for review
INTRODUCTION
What Globe Team Is
Globe Team is steamHouse practice oriented toward planetary-scale challenges — connecting local action to global purpose.
Globe Team is for people who:
Care about challenges bigger than their immediate circle
Want their local action to connect to systemic change
Seek community with others who share this orientation
Need frameworks for sustainable engagement with overwhelming problems
Globe Team assumes you already have (or are developing) the foundational steamHouse capacities — purpose, paradigm, practice. It extends these toward the largest scales of concern.
Who This Is For
Primary Audience: Ages 16+ whose purpose embraces planetary-scale challenges.
This naturally complements:
Hero stage (16-20): Purpose is crystallizing, contribution capacity emerging
Whole-Real Human (20+): Generativity and institutional engagement developing
Globe Team works for:
Young people whose purpose is taking global shape
Adults working in sustainability, development, civic engagement, or related fields
Anyone whose steamHouse journey leads toward systemic contribution
How This Relates to Other steamHouse Materials
Material
Relationship to Globe Team
Framework Guide Ch 25
Globe Team operationalizes supertribe and Care Space concepts
Framework Guide Ch 31
Globe Team extends contribution to supertribes
FULSOME E6 (Democracy/Citizenship)
Globe Team draws on this research foundation
FULSOME E7 (Planetary Context)
Globe Team draws on this research foundation
Manual Volume IV
Globe Team parallels and extends Hero/Whole-Real Human content
Activity Bootstrap Guides
Domain-specific Globe Team guides (future) will follow this pattern
Chronicles (TeraTerraTribe)
Optional narrative inspiration for Globe Team orientation
Document Structure
This Framework Guide provides the conceptual architecture. Companion materials (in development) will include:
Globe Team Domain Guides — Specific guides for climate, democracy, development, etc. (Bootstrap Guide format)
Globe Team Action Catalog — Specific projects and organizations by domain
Globe Team Community Resources — Network-building tools
PART I: FOUNDATIONS
Chapter 1: The Supertribe Imperative
Why Comfort Tribes Can't Solve Global Problems
The problems that matter most are too big for people who already agree with each other.
The Math:
Climate change requires coordination among billions of people with different values, interests, and worldviews
Democratic health requires collaboration among citizens who disagree profoundly
Economic development requires cooperation across cultures, nations, and ideologies
Pandemic preparedness requires trust among competitors
None of these can be solved by gathering people who think alike. They require supertribes — large groups united by few shared principles, not cultural similarity.
The Supertribe Insight
Comfort Tribe: Few people, many shared values. Easy because everyone's similar. Limited in scale and scope.
Supertribe: Many people, few shared values. Hard because everyone's different — but it's the only way large-scale cooperation happens.
The counterintuitive truth: bigger groups require less agreement, not more. But what they agree on must be solid.
The HOT HEADLINE
"There are a very few ideas we all might reasonably share. Let's promote them."
This is the TeraTerraTribe rallying cry — and the Globe Team operating principle.
Across vast differences, certain principles might be genuinely universal:
Evidence matters (Objective Reason)
People deserve dignity and self-determination (Personal Agency, Mutual Respect)
We should examine our own thinking (Reflective Thinking)
Globe Team focuses on these sparse shared principles rather than thick cultural agreement.
The Positive Definition Key
Supertribes work through positive definition:
Negatively-defined groups: "We're the people who are NOT them." Identity requires enemies.
Positively-defined groups: "We're the people who value X." Identity doesn't require enemies.
Globe Team is positively defined. We're for conscious, purposeful, connected living — not against any particular enemy.
Chapter 2: Care Space at Planetary Scale
The Outermost Circles
The Care Space model (Framework Guide Ch 22-25) describes expanding circles:
Self
Close relationships (family, intimate friends)
Team/community (known groups)
Tribe (larger identity groups)
Others (people you don't know)
World (physical world, global systems)
Personal Whole (meaning, integration)
Globe Team operates primarily in circles 5-7 — the scales that extend beyond anyone you could personally know.
What "World" Includes
Human Systems:
Economic systems (markets, trade, development)
Political systems (governance, democracy, rights)
Technological systems (information, energy, infrastructure)
Cultural systems (ideas, values, meaning-making)
Planetary Systems:
Climate and atmosphere
Oceans and water cycles
Biodiversity and ecosystems
Land use and food systems
Why This Matters: These systems are the substrate of everyone's life. They determine what's possible for billions of people. Ignoring them doesn't make you independent — it makes you unaware.
Citizenship as World-Care
For most people, world-care operates through citizenship.
Citizenship connects you to political systems that shape collective life. It's not minimal duty (vote occasionally) but active engagement:
Staying informed about issues that matter
Participating in democratic processes
Contributing to civil society
Engaging diverse perspectives
Taking your role in collective self-governance seriously
Planetary Care
The outermost world-care concerns the planet itself.
Humans now affect planetary systems: climate, biodiversity, ocean chemistry, land use. What previous generations could ignore — the stability of global systems — now requires attention.
This isn't about guilt or apocalypse. It's about recognizing the context you're embedded in. The human story unfolds within a planetary story.
Chapter 3: Think Global, Act Local — Operationalized
The Challenge
Global challenges feel overwhelming because:
Scale is incomprehensible (billions of people, decades of time)
Causation is diffuse (no single intervention solves it)
Feedback is delayed (you won't see results)
Individual contribution feels meaningless
Globe Team doesn't deny these realities. It provides frameworks for acting anyway.
The Local Entry Point
Every global challenge has local manifestations:
Global Challenge
Local Manifestation
Climate change
Local energy, transportation, land use
Democratic erosion
Local elections, school boards, civic orgs
Economic inequality
Local economic development, living wages
Biodiversity loss
Local habitat, land use, species protection
Public health
Local health infrastructure, preparedness
The Practice: Find where the global challenge shows up in your accessible context. That's where you can act.
The "Glonacal" Perspective
Effective action often requires seeing across scales simultaneously:
Global: What's the systemic pattern?
National: How do policies and institutions mediate it?
Local: Where can I actually intervene?
Neither pure global thinking (paralyzing abstraction) nor pure local thinking (missing systemic patterns) is sufficient. You need both.
Long Time Horizons
Many global challenges require intergenerational thinking:
Climate stabilization is a 30-100 year project
Democratic renewal is multi-generational
Cultural change is measured in decades
Implications:
Don't expect quick wins
Evaluate progress on long timescales
Build for successors, not just yourself
Plant trees you won't sit under
PART II: FINDING YOUR GLOBE TEAM PURPOSE
Chapter 4: Purpose at Planetary Scale
The Three-Way Intersection
Your Globe Team purpose lives where three things meet:
What you care about: The global challenges that stir you. This is Heart — purpose driven by genuine concern.
What you can affect: Your skills, position, resources, context. This is Body — realistic capacity.
What needs doing: Actual gaps where contribution is needed. This is Head — honest assessment of utility.
Purpose without capacity = frustration Capacity without purpose = emptiness Purpose + capacity without need = wasted effort
Avoiding Overwhelm
Global challenges are infinite. You are finite.
Bounded Commitment: Choose a specific domain, specific approach, sustainable engagement level. You can't do everything — you can do something.
Portfolio Approach: Primary commitment + secondary interests + awareness of other domains. Concentrate for impact; diversify for perspective.
Sustainable Engagement: This is a marathon, not a sprint. Burnout serves no one. Sustainable rhythm over heroic bursts.
The Purpose Clarification Process
Survey: What global challenges concern you? (List without judgment)
Prioritize: Which concern you most? Where do you have capacity?
Investigate: What's actually happening in that domain? Who's working on it?
Locate: Where could YOU contribute given your position?
Commit: Make a bounded commitment (time-limited, revisable)
Review: Periodically reassess fit and effectiveness
Chapter 5: Domains of Contribution
Overview
Globe Team doesn't require commitment to a specific domain. But most Globe Team practitioners focus somewhere. Here are major domains:
Climate and Environment
The Challenge: Stabilizing climate, protecting ecosystems, sustainable human activity.
Manifestations:
Energy systems (generation, efficiency)
Transportation systems
Land use and food systems
Consumption patterns
Policy and regulation
Entry Points:
Individual behavior (necessary but insufficient)
Community-level action (local energy, transportation, land use)
Organizational change (workplaces, institutions)
Policy engagement (advocacy, voting, organizing)
Movement participation (climate organizations)
Democracy and Civic Health
The Challenge: Maintaining and strengthening democratic institutions, civic culture, collective self-governance.
Manifestations:
Electoral integrity
Informed citizenship
Civic discourse quality
Institutional health
Cross-difference collaboration
Entry Points:
Personal civic engagement (voting, staying informed)
Local participation (school boards, city council, local orgs)
Bridging work (across political difference)
Movement participation (democracy-focused organizations)
Institutional service (running for office, serving on boards)
Global Development
The Challenge: Reducing poverty, improving wellbeing, enabling human flourishing globally.
Manifestations:
Economic opportunity
Health systems
Education access
Governance quality
Rights protection
Entry Points:
Supporting effective organizations (giving, volunteering)
Professional work in development
Policy advocacy
Local-global connections (fair trade, ethical consumption)
Public Health and Preparedness
The Challenge: Protecting population health, preparing for health emergencies.
Manifestations:
Health infrastructure
Pandemic preparedness
Disease prevention
Health equity
Entry Points:
Professional health work
Community health engagement
Policy advocacy
Preparedness (personal and community)
Technology and Its Governance
The Challenge: Ensuring technology serves humanity, managing risks, directing development wisely.
Manifestations:
AI safety and governance
Information ecosystem health
Digital rights
Technology access equity
Entry Points:
Technical work with ethical orientation
Policy engagement
Digital citizenship (personal practice)
Supporting governance organizations
Other Domains
Peace and conflict resolution
Human rights
Education (global scale)
Migration and refugees
[Additional domains as relevant]
Chapter 6: From Purpose to Practice
The Think Big → Be Real → Act Framework
Think Big: What's the largest vision? What would success look like at scale? What do you care about most?
Be Real: What are the constraints? What's actually possible? What resources exist? What's already being done?
Act: Given purpose and constraints, what will you actually DO? Specific, bounded, trackable.
Levels of Action
Level
Examples
Characteristics
Individual behavior
Personal consumption, lifestyle
Necessary but insufficient; models but doesn't transform
Influence on close others
Conversations, relationships
Multiplicative but limited reach
Community/local action
Local organizing, local institutions
Tangible, visible, limited scale
Organizational impact
Workplace change, institutional reform
Leverage through institutions
Movement participation
Joining organizations, collective action
Scale through coordination
Policy/systemic change
Advocacy, politics, structural change
Highest leverage, hardest to achieve
What "Act" Looks Like When Problems Are Global
You won't solve climate change. You won't fix democracy. But you can:
Contribute to organizations that work on it
Model alternative approaches
Shift the people around you
Participate in collective action
Influence institutions you're part of
Support policy change
Prepare the next generation
The question isn't "Will my individual action solve this?" (No.) It's "Is my action part of a collective pattern that could solve this?" (Maybe — and the aggregate of such actions is all we have.)
Sustainable Engagement
Global challenges don't take breaks. You must.
Principles:
Bounded commitment (defined scope, not infinite obligation)
Regular rhythm (sustainable pattern, not crisis-to-crisis)
Rest without guilt (you're more effective rested)
Joy as part of the work (not opposed to it)
Community support (you can't do this alone)
PART III: SYSTEMS THINKING AS PRIMARY LENS
Chapter 7: Seeing in Systems
Why Linear Thinking Fails at Global Scale
Linear thinking: A causes B causes C. Simple chains. Direct intervention.
Reality of global systems: Everything connects. Causes become effects become causes. Feedback loops. Emergent properties. Non-obvious consequences.
Linear interventions in complex systems often fail — or backfire through channels nobody anticipated.
Core Systems Concepts
Feedback Loops:
Reinforcing loops: Change amplifies itself (growth spirals, vicious cycles)
Balancing loops: Change triggers counter-forces (thermostats, equilibria)
Emergence: Properties of systems that don't exist in components. Consciousness from neurons. Market prices from trades. Culture from interactions.
Non-linearity: Small changes can have large effects; large changes can have small effects. Depends on system state and location.
Delay: Effects take time. Cause today, consequence years later. This makes feedback confusing — we don't connect action to outcome.
The Meadows Levels of Intervention
Donella Meadows identified leverage points in systems, from least to most effective:
Shallow Leverage (easier to change, less impact):
Parameters (numbers: subsidies, taxes, standards)
Buffers (stabilizing stocks)
Stock-and-flow structures
Medium Leverage:
Delays in feedback loops
Balancing feedback loops
Reinforcing feedback loops
Information flows
Rules of the system
Deep Leverage (harder to change, more impact):
Power over rules (governance)
Goals of the system
Paradigms underlying the system
Transcending paradigms
Implication: Most activism targets shallow leverage (change this policy, adjust this number). Deeper change requires shifting goals, paradigms, governance.
Avoiding Intervention-Caused Problems
When we "fix" complex systems, we often create new problems:
Pesticides that kill predators, causing pest resurgence
Foreign aid that undermines local capacity
Technology that solves one problem while creating others
Policies with unintended consequences
Humility Required: Complex systems are partially unpredictable. Intervention is experiment. Monitor, learn, adjust.
Chapter 8: The Global-Local Connection
How Global Systems Manifest Locally
Global systems aren't abstractions — they show up where you are:
Global System
Local Manifestation
Climate system
Local weather, flooding, heat, fire risk
Economic system
Local jobs, prices, opportunities
Political system
Local governance, law enforcement, services
Information system
Local media, discourse, misinformation
Ecological system
Local species, habitat, water quality
The Practice: Look at your local context. Ask: what global systems are visible here?
Finding Leverage in Local Action
Local action matters globally when:
It demonstrates alternatives (models)
It shifts local pieces of global systems (actual change)
It connects to coordinated action elsewhere (movements)
It develops capacity that scales (replication)
Examples:
Local energy transition → demonstrates feasibility → informs broader adoption
Local civic engagement → strengthens local democracy → contributes to national health
Local economic innovation → models alternatives → inspires adoption elsewhere
When Local Action Matters vs. When It Doesn't
Local action matters most when:
The global system is an aggregate of local actions
Local demonstration can spread
Local action is part of coordinated movement
Local institutions can influence larger systems
Local action matters less when:
The problem requires national/global coordination
Local action can't scale or replicate
Local action substitutes for systemic engagement
The Integration: Local action alone isn't sufficient for global problems. But global strategy without local action is abstract and impotent. You need both.
Virtue Theater vs. Actual Contribution
Not all apparent "good action" is equally useful:
Higher Value:
Actions that actually shift systems
Actions that build capacity for more action
Actions that are part of coordinated strategy
Actions that change others' behavior (not just your own)
Lower Value:
Actions that feel good but change little
Actions that substitute for more effective action
Actions that primarily signal identity
Actions optimized for self-perception
Note: This isn't about guilt — it's about effectiveness. Some low-value actions are fine (they support your motivation). Just don't confuse them with high-value contribution.
Chapter 9: Long-Term Thinking
Intergenerational Timescales
Many global challenges unfold over generations:
Climate consequences emerge over 30-100 years
Democratic cultures are built (or eroded) over generations
Institutional change is slow
Cultural shifts are measured in decades
Implications:
Plant trees you won't sit under
Build for your successors
Evaluate on long timescales
Don't expect quick validation
Legacy and Future-Orientation
The Seventh Generation Principle: Consider the impact of decisions on seven generations hence.
This isn't a calculation (you can't predict that far). It's an orientation — a reminder that your decisions ripple forward, affecting people who don't yet exist.
Questions for Legacy Thinking:
What am I building that will outlast me?
What will I leave for those who come after?
How will my choices constrain or enable future options?
Maintaining Motivation Across Decades
Challenge: How do you stay engaged with problems that won't be solved in your lifetime?
Approaches:
Process attachment: Find meaning in the work itself, not just outcomes
Incremental wins: Celebrate steps, not just destinations
Community: Share the journey with others
Long view: You're part of a multi-generational project
Local satisfaction: Do good locally while thinking globally
Legacy framing: Your role is to advance the work, not finish it
PART IV: JOINING AND CONTRIBUTING
Chapter 10: The Landscape of Movements
What "Movements" Are
A movement is a sustained collective effort to create social/political change. Movements include:
Formal organizations (nonprofits, advocacy groups)
Informal networks (coalitions, communities of practice)
Mass participation (protests, voting blocs)
Professional work (people whose jobs address the challenge)
Finding Your Place
Questions:
What movements address challenges you care about?
Which organizations align with your values?
Where are entry points for someone in your position?
What kind of contribution can you make (time, money, expertise)?
Evaluating Movements/Organizations
Not all organizations claiming to address a challenge are equally effective.
Evaluation Considerations:
Theory of change: Is their approach plausible?
Evidence: Does their work actually accomplish goals?
Efficiency: How do they use resources?
Integrity: Do they practice what they preach?
Fit: Do they align with your values and approach?
Caution: Evaluation is imperfect. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. But don't excuse ineffective work because intentions are good.
Entry Points
Your Position
Entry Point Options
Limited time
Donate to effective organizations
Some time
Volunteer locally; participate in events
More time
Join organizations; take active roles
Professional interest
Seek work in aligned organizations/sectors
Leadership interest
Start initiatives; organize others
Chapter 11: Citizenship as Practice
Active Citizenship
Citizenship is not passive status but active practice:
Staying Informed:
Following issues that matter
Seeking diverse sources
Distinguishing reliable from unreliable information
Updating views based on evidence
Participating:
Voting (consistently, informedly)
Beyond voting: primaries, local elections, referenda
Contacting representatives
Attending public meetings
Serving on boards, commissions, juries
Contributing:
Joining civic organizations
Volunteering in community
Supporting civil society (donations, membership)
Engaging Difference:
Maintaining relationships across political difference
Seeking to understand, not just defeat, opposing views
Practicing the supertribe capacity: working with people who differ from you
The Citizenship Check
Self-assessment for civic engagement:
Do I vote consistently (all elections, not just presidential)?
Am I informed about issues that affect my community/nation?
Do I participate in any civic organizations?
Do I maintain relationships with people who vote differently?
Do I contribute to civil society (time or money)?
Do I engage local governance at all?
If answers are mostly no: That's information, not judgment. Where could you start?
Cross-Difference Engagement
Globe Team requires working with people who differ from you profoundly. This is the supertribe capacity.
Practices:
Seek relationships outside your political bubble
Steelman opposing views (present them charitably)
Distinguish "disagree" from "enemy"
Find minimal shared ground for cooperation
Maintain dignity even in profound disagreement
Chapter 12: Leadership as Service at Scale
The Servant Leadership Frame
Leadership is often framed as getting others to follow you. The alternative: leadership as service.
Greenleaf's Question: "Do those served grow as persons? Do they, while being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely themselves to become servants?"
What Service Leadership Looks Like
Listening first: Understanding before proposing
Developing others: Building capacity, not dependence
Sharing power: Distributing authority appropriately
Taking blame, sharing credit: Protecting those you lead
Building for legacy, not tenure: Will the institution be healthier after you leave?
When to Join vs. When to Start
Join existing efforts when:
Something effective already exists
Your contribution enhances what's there
You can learn from those who've been at it longer
Starting something new would fragment effort
Start something new when:
Nothing addresses the need
Existing efforts have fundamental problems
Your innovation is genuinely different and needed
You can sustain it (not just launch and abandon)
Most of the time, joining is more valuable than starting. The world has enough organizations. It needs more effective contributors to existing efforts.
Institutional Stewardship
Institutions are the infrastructure of collective action. Globe Team includes caring for institutions — not just pursuing causes.
Stewardship includes:
Making institutions work better
Defending institutions against erosion
Reforming institutions that need it
Building institutional capacity for successors
PART V: THE GLOBE TEAM PRACTICE
Chapter 13: Local Manifestation Projects
Finding Your Project
Where does your chosen global challenge show up locally in a form you can address?
Process:
Identify the global challenge (from your purpose work)
Map local manifestations (how does it appear here?)
Assess your capacity (what can you actually do?)
Find or create entry (existing efforts? something to start?)
Commit (bounded, sustainable, specific)
Example: Climate Local Manifestation
Level
Example Action
Personal
Reduce personal emissions
Household
Home energy efficiency
Community
Local climate advocacy, transportation alternatives
Municipal
City policy engagement, local elections
Organizational
Workplace sustainability
State
Policy advocacy at state level
Example: Democracy Local Manifestation
Level
Example Action
Personal
Informed voting, civic education
Relational
Cross-difference conversations
Community
Local civic organizations, public meetings
Municipal
School board, city council engagement
Organizational
Workplace dialogue, institutional health
State/National
Voting rights, electoral reform engagement
The steamHouse Overlay
Any local manifestation project can be wrapped with steamHouse practice:
Before:
What's our purpose here?
How does this connect to the larger challenge?
What's the theory of change?
During:
Regular reflection on progress
Learning from setbacks (AAR)
Connecting local action to systemic understanding
After:
What did we learn?
What impact did we have?
How do we build on this?
Chapter 14: The Globe Team Calendar
Annual Rhythm
Rather than crisis-to-crisis engagement, establish sustainable rhythm:
Quarterly Review:
How is my Globe Team engagement going?
Am I sustainable?
What's working, what isn't?
What needs to shift?
Annual Assessment:
Is my current focus still right?
How has my capacity/situation changed?
What did I actually accomplish this year?
What am I committing to next year?
Civic Calendar
Time
Civic Engagement Opportunity
January
Annual commitment setting
February-March
State legislative sessions (many states)
April
Tax season, Earth Day (April 22)
Spring
Local elections (many municipalities)
Summer
Community engagement, preparation for fall
Fall
General elections, school year civic education
November
Election Day, post-election processing
December
Year-end giving, annual review
Creating Personal Practice Calendar
Identify key dates (elections, events, organizational meetings)
Schedule reflection (quarterly reviews)
Block engagement time (consistent, not just reactive)
Include rest (sustainable rhythm, not burnout)
Chapter 15: Reflection and Learning
Applying AAR to Civic/Global Work
The After-Action Review works for Globe Team projects:
What was supposed to happen? (What were we trying to achieve?)
What actually happened? (What occurred? What impact?)
Why the difference? (What worked? What didn't? Why?)
What will we do differently? (What changes for next time?)
Learning from Movement History
Movements succeed and fail. Learning from history:
What works:
Clear demands
Sustained pressure
Coalition building
Institutional engagement alongside protest
Long-term perspective
What doesn't work:
Vague goals
Short-term bursts without follow-through
Purity tests that shrink coalitions
Violence (in most contexts)
Assuming righteousness = success
Calibrating Effectiveness
Questions for ongoing calibration:
Is my theory of change plausible?
Am I seeing evidence of impact?
Am I learning and improving?
Am I sustainable?
Is this the best use of my capacity?
When to persist: Impact evidence, even if slow. Learning is occurring. Sustainable engagement.
When to shift: No impact evidence over time. Stagnation. Burnout. Better opportunity emerges.
PART VI: THE GLOBE TEAM COMMUNITY
Chapter 16: Globe Team as Network
The Vision
Globe Team isn't just a curriculum — it's a community of practitioners connected by shared orientation.
What Globe Team community provides:
Mutual support and encouragement
Shared learning from different domains
Collaboration on projects
Accountability for commitments
Sustainable engagement through connection
Local Globe Team Clusters
Where there are multiple Globe Team practitioners, local clusters can form:
Elements:
Regular meetings (monthly?)
Shared projects or cross-support
Learning exchange (what are you learning?)
Encouragement and accountability
Virtual/Distributed Community
Globe Team naturally includes geographically distributed practitioners:
Connections:
Online forums/discussion
Periodic virtual gatherings
Domain-specific networks
Cross-geography collaboration
Cross-Geography Collaboration
Global challenges benefit from people in different locations working together:
Examples:
Climate advocacy networks spanning regions
Democracy support across national contexts
Development partnerships across wealth divides
Chapter 17: Globe Team Across Stages
Heroes (16-20): Purpose Crystallizing
What's happening:
Purpose taking clearer shape
Beginning to see how identity connects to larger contribution
Capacity growing but not yet full
Idealism meets reality
Globe Team emphasis:
Connecting emerging purpose to global challenges
Entry-level movement participation
Learning about domains of contribution
Building knowledge and skills for future engagement
Mentor role:
Supporting purpose discovery
Helping connect passion to effective action
Providing models of engaged adults
Moderating between idealism and cynicism
Whole-Real Human (20-24+): Contribution Maturing
What's happening:
Adult capacity developed
Generativity emerging (caring for next generation)
Institutional roles growing
Long-term perspective developing
Globe Team emphasis:
Sustained engagement in chosen domains
Leadership roles in movements/organizations
Mentoring younger Globe Team members
Building for legacy
Community role:
Experienced practitioners supporting newer ones
Creating infrastructure for Globe Team continuity
Transmitting wisdom across generations
Chapter 18: Connection to steamHouse Ecosystem
Relationship to Core Framework
Globe Team isn't separate from steamHouse — it's an extension:
Core Framework
Globe Team Application
Purpose (Gold Star Ideals)
Purpose extended to planetary scale
Paradigm (Red Toolbox)
Systems thinking, supertribe capacity
Practice (Green Gear)
Citizenship skills, movement participation
Care Space
Outer circles emphasized
Four Principles
Applied to global cooperation
Relationship to Club
If you're in a steamHouse Club:
Globe Team extends Club learning to larger scales
Club provides community; Globe Team extends orientation
Club activities can connect to Globe Team purposes
If you're not in a Club:
Globe Team can be practiced independently
Globe Team networks can serve community function
The TeraTerraTribe Connection (Optional)
The Chronicles story world features TeraTerraTribe — a supertribe across timelines facing civilizational challenges.
For those drawn to the narrative:
TeraTerraTribe embodies Globe Team principles
Chronicles stories illustrate supertribe dynamics
The narrative provides imaginative framing
For those preferring non-narrative approach:
Globe Team works entirely without Chronicles reference
The principles don't require the story
PART VII: NAVIGATING CONTESTED TERRAIN
Chapter 19: When Reason and Evidence Are Clear
The steamHouse Position
Where reason and evidence point clearly, steamHouse says so:
Climate change is real, human-caused, and serious — this is scientific consensus
Democracy is preferable to authoritarianism — this is normative commitment based on human dignity
Evidence-based approaches outperform ideology-driven approaches — this is empirical
Not Everything Is Equally Uncertain
False balance treats contested topics as if all positions were equally valid. They're not.
The earth is warming: not genuinely contested (scientifically)
Best policy response: genuinely contested (involves values, tradeoffs)
Evolution occurred: not genuinely contested (scientifically)
Implications for meaning: genuinely contested (involves values, worldview)
steamHouse acknowledges what's settled while engaging what's genuinely open.
Chapter 20: Where Values and Perspectives Differ
Genuine Value Pluralism
Some disagreements reflect different values, not different facts:
How to weigh liberty vs. equality
How to weigh present vs. future
How to weigh local vs. global
How much risk to accept for potential benefit
These aren't resolvable by evidence — they require value choices.
Legacy and Tradition
Some disagreements reflect different relationships to tradition:
How much deference does the past deserve?
When is inherited wisdom valuable vs. outdated?
How fast should change occur?
These aren't simply "progressive vs. conservative" — they're genuine tensions in human life.
Navigating This Terrain
steamHouse approach:
Acknowledge genuine uncertainty where it exists
Avoid pretending value choices are purely technical
Present multiple reasonable perspectives
Encourage reflective thinking about your own position
Maintain dialogue across difference
What steamHouse Doesn't Do
Pretend scientific consensus is uncertain when it isn't
Avoid difficult topics because they're contested
Impose particular value frameworks beyond minimal shared principles
Demonize those who disagree on genuinely contested matters
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Global Challenges Overview
Brief overview of major global challenges (to be expanded):
Climate and Environment
Current state: ~1.2°C warming, accelerating impacts
Key dynamics: Energy transition, ecosystem protection, adaptation
Major uncertainties: Pace of change, tipping points, political will
Democratic Health
Current state: Global democratic recession, polarization
Key dynamics: Institutional erosion, information ecosystem, civic culture
Major uncertainties: Technology effects, generational shifts, institutional resilience
Global Development
Current state: Progress on poverty, persistent inequality
Key dynamics: Economic growth, governance, health, education
Major uncertainties: Climate impacts, technology effects, geopolitics
[Continue for other domains]
Appendix B: Movement/Organization Evaluation Framework
Questions for evaluating organizations:
Theory of Change:
What's their theory of how change happens?
Is it plausible?
Does evidence support it?
Track Record:
What have they accomplished?
What evidence exists for impact?
Leadership and Governance:
Who leads? What's their credibility?
Is governance accountable?
Resources:
How do they use money?
What's the overhead ratio? (Be careful — low overhead isn't always good)
Culture and Integrity:
Do they practice what they preach?
How do they treat staff, volunteers?
Appendix C: The Citizenship Check (Self-Assessment)
Rate yourself on each (1-5 scale):
Informedness:
I follow major issues affecting my community
I can explain the basics of key policy debates
I seek diverse sources of information
I update my views based on evidence
Participation:
I vote in all elections (not just presidential)
I engage local governance (meetings, contact)
I participate in civic organizations
I contribute to civil society (time or money)
Engagement:
I maintain relationships with people who vote differently
I can steelman opposing views
I engage difference with curiosity, not contempt
I contribute to civic discourse constructively
Total Score Interpretation:
12 or below: Significant room for growth
13-20: Engaged citizen with areas to develop
21-28: Active citizen, consider deeper contribution
29-36: Highly engaged, consider leadership roles
Appendix D: Systems Thinking Tools Quick Reference
Feedback Loop Diagrams: Map reinforcing and balancing loops in systems you're trying to understand.
Stock and Flow Mapping: Identify what accumulates (stocks) and what moves (flows).
Leverage Point Analysis: Where in the system could intervention have most effect?
Scenario Planning: What are multiple plausible futures? What would each require?
Root Cause Analysis: Trace problems to underlying causes (5 Whys, Fishbone diagrams).
Appendix E: Development Markers Especially Relevant to Globe Team
Stars (Character):
S8: Purpose Clarity — essential for Globe Team orientation
S11: Service Orientation — contribution motivation
S14: Respect & Belonging — supertribe capacity
Lenses (Thinking):
L17: Stakeholder Mapping — understanding systems
L18: Long-Term Consequence — intergenerational thinking
L20: Supertribe Capacity — working across difference
L21: Systems Thinking — understanding complex dynamics
Keys (Skills):
K14: Direct Communication — civic discourse
K16: Mentoring Others — developing the next generation
K17: Conflict Navigation — working across difference
Appendix F: Resources by Domain
Climate and Environment:
Drawdown edited by Paul Hawken — solutions inventory
Project Drawdown (drawdown.org) — ranked solutions
350.org — movement organization
[Local climate organizations]
Democracy and Civic Health:
How Democracies Die by Levitsky & Ziblatt
Protect Democracy — institutional defense
Bridge Alliance — cross-partisan network
[Local civic organizations]
Effective Philanthropy:
GiveWell — effective charity evaluation
Open Philanthropy — cause prioritization
80,000 Hours — career impact guidance
General:
Limits to Growth by Meadows et al. — systems dynamics classic
Thinking in Systems by Donella Meadows — accessible systems primer